W3C

We’ve been doing HTML at uni lately, well others have, I’ve been doing CSS. All our pages have to be to W3C standards though. This as you can imagine, left me getting rather bored, so I started throwing random sites at it. The graph shows the results from 10 sites I re-ran at 3:30pm NST today.Note: Not all Errors are actual errors, some are mistakes reading the page, like php links.

http://validator.w3.org/

EDIT:

www.pinkpt.com/	XHTML 1.0 Transitional	20 Errors
www.neolodge.com/	XHTML 1.0 Transitional	70 Errors
www.neopets.com/	HTML 4.01 Transitional	32 Errors, 49 warnings

And pinkpt even claim to be standard compliant! Liars.